Alerts, Scoring and Calculated Fields

RichG  Jul 7th 2006 at 12:48
I appreciate this is where it gets quite hard in software, but I thought I'd throw the idea around to see what people think.

Bernard Hinault, 5 time Tour de France winner and oft overlooked cycling legend used to apply a basic scoring system to his training. This was for motivation and to help balance his training load. Now on Tri blogs - if you have a coach putting a plan in for you, these kind of things are probably taken into account and wouldn't necessarily be needed. However for a solo athlete recording and monitoring their own training it can be a crude but effective tool. How you'd do it in Triblogs I'm not sure.

Here's the idea
BH decided that there was a minimum amount of training he had to do to be a) fit, b) competitive or c) winning races (I can hear the alarm claxens going off from some coaches already but stick with it). Basically determine the training you want/need/would like to do and convert this into points based on duration and/or intensity. When you do a session you score points e.g. 30 minutes at steady pace = 30 points. 30 minutes high intensity = 90 points ideally you create the scoring system based on your own criteria. If you record the points you score for each session you can then start to measure this against what you wanted to do etc. So you can start to identify if you are not doing as much training as you want to (below your projected point score) or too much training (above your predicted point score) in which case ease off etc.

What it would require in triblogs would be the ability to match (your own) scores to each of the intensity levels 60-70%, 70-80% etc, then have a calculated field that multiplies this score by your duration to give you a session score. Looking further from this you could have alerts programmed in that were based on your planned accumulated score. These could then fire off if you go a certain % over or under target. Ignoring the BH points philosophy for a moment, this could also be useful based on a time basis i.e. if triblogs said 36 hours is too much training for one week you nutter” or “you aren't gonna get under 2:15 in a standard distance sitting on your backside all week well... maybe the same sentiments but slightly better worded....

As I mentioned, the points system is fairly crude, probably needs more explanation, and probably isn't for everyone, but it can be quite useful and motivational for target driven individuals (does this describe any triathletes you know?). Although probably a little tricky to incorporate from a programming perspective.

Had 10 minutes spare so thought I'd mention it....
You must log in or join to post a message here.

Welcome to TriBlogs the free online training solution.

Plan, record, analyse and share your triathlon experiences. Click here to join
Other threads that may be of interest
Apr 12th 2012 at 14:15
Oct 27th 2012 at 17:44
May 5th 2010 at 19:05
Nov 18th 2009 at 16:36
Mar 27th 2009 at 10:13
Jan 9th 2015 at 18:37
Apr 12th 2012 at 22:53
Jul 6th 2012 at 11:40
Jun 29th 2012 at 09:02
Any posts in the TriBlogs Forum are posted by individuals acting in their own right and do not necessarily reflect the views of TriBlogs. TriBlogs is in no way responsible for the content of external links. If you have an issue with the content of a discussion, please contact us.